fuzzard

Results 164 comments of fuzzard

There's a bunch of failures (flatc, pcre). I'm on holiday at the moment, so I'll look into it further in a week or two

Alright, i believe UWP is now building correctly. As mentioned, there were 3 build failures (pcre/libnfs/flatc). The flatc build failure is a clean generic solution. pcre was just requiring to...

@a1rwulf mind splitting off the first 2 commits into a separate PR. just saves me the hassle for an attempt at a store release, haha

Baby steps. Currently we have ZERO insight into flatpak build status. @razzeee does a release when a major release is done (monthly at best). The intent is to be able...

I should also mention, and this is solely my opinion, i like how @Flole998 just explicitly has each step laid out in the GHA, and isnt based on some "random"...

@Flole998 i assume it would be possible to do a build matrix that would allow building for example, both x86_64 and aarch64? Sort of how we currently build x86_64/arm/aarch64 for...

> The problem is, if you pr something here, that breaks flatpak, you will need to patch the flathub repo now, in addition and it becomes unclear which versions of...

thats what the following is doing. Its checking out the PR via git, and changing the flathub to use that source checkout for the build. ``` # Add local git...

Why would we want to change depends? Your a linux system essentially, you provide the libs however the "distro" wants. In this case, you set your libs in flathub, and...