James Fish
James Fish
@josevalim yes it would be better if you are planning alot of tasks. However this is useful for running a task in the shell while developing/testing or to run a...
A slight correction, it would use the same API as `Task` by calling the `Task.Sup` API.
Ah I thought this had been rejected. Did you decide on this? I think it is better to have a `Task.Supervisor` inside an application, so that it is known that...
I was able to get a statem generator working with an older version of this code, so it should still be possible. I haven't looked at the proper code but...
Yes, you can do it with the generator already, it doesn't require a change to stream_data On 20 Oct 2017 12:01, "tmbb" wrote: I bave a question regarding stateful testing...
I don't think storing the seeds would not be enough because over time the test generators could change and the seed would nolonger produce same data. On 27 Aug 2017...
@tmbb my main interest is in state machine testing, which I think only appears in the Erlang quickcheck libraries. In those situations it is likely that generators would change over...
> but wouldn't you be able to generate the state transitions from the random seed? Unfortunately not if the generators change. The tests work by generating a list of commands...
@tmbb we are able to serialize any pure datastructure to disk, the impure ones too but it wont reproduce the old side effects if that makes a difference. I am...
Just to be clear, I was referring to StreamData providing this feature, not another library that isn't specifically targeting StreamData.