Igor Zubiaurre

All I'm asking you to do is **TEST** with jquery 3.5.1 instead of the provided _jqueries_ (`imagekit_cropper/static/imagekit_cropper/js/vendor/jquery.js` and `imagekit_cropper/static/imagekit_cropper/jcrop/js/jquery.min.js`). I'm **NOT** asking you to release a version shipping jquery 3.5.1...

Is there anything still to be done here?

Is it still an issue on the new website also, @WillemJiang ? If so we need some more details to address this. As non chinese speakers the problem is not...

The suggested _Incubator Pipeline_ pattern resembles the process ISC patterns go through, escalating through [maturity levels](https://github.com/InnerSourceCommons/InnerSourcePatterns/blob/e3abd84243e185a8e00529657fbb8f966c498019/meta/contributor-handbook.md). If we can assimilate the ISC process for patterns as a particular application of...

The current mess: | index pattern | repository | repo_name | github_repo | gitlab_repo | origin | tag | url | |----------------------------------|---------------|----------------|------------------|----------------|---------|------|-----| | `git` | missing | available | short...

Let's take the sanitized full git https URL as baseline: _sanitize_: strip user and password if present in the URL. - Field name: `repo_url_git` - Pattern: https:////.git Then we can...

This shows the noise at the UI:  `Author_bot` and `Author-domain` are shown duplicated. These are just 2 examples. There are many more duplicated fields like these.

According to @jjmerchante: _[this function](https://github.com/chaoss/grimoirelab-elk/blob/master/grimoire_elk/enriched/enrich.py#L1028) causes the duplication. It loops over the backend-declared roles and then over the generic `author`. Thus, Git for instance [declares a capitalized `Author` role](https://github.com/chaoss/grimoirelab-elk/blob/master/grimoire_elk/enriched/git.py#L88) and...

I think we could merge this with the [Communication tooling](https://patterns.innersourcecommons.org/p/communication-tooling) pattern. WDYT @spier, @Trueblueaddie, @MaineC?

> @fioddor based on #526 I understand that we can close this PR here as duplicate, right? I guess so. WDYT, @Trueblueaddie? > Just saw that this PR mentions two...