fabrifls

Results 12 comments of fabrifls

@sanjaysabnani I don't know if the same thing is happening to you, but I had problems with the CRC token that I couldn't solve. The solution was that the environment...

> Sorry, but I haven't worked on this project in years and would consider the code vastly outdated. A community library like this easily turns into a full time side...

Any solution to this? It would be a good functionality for those of us who use the generation of dialogs at runtime, allowing us to edit/delete them

I can't figure out when pushname can come with value. I think it also depends on the privacy that the user has configured in their WhatsApp. Sometimes even scheduling the...

> had this too with nextjs and app router, that cause styles blinking on Antd components, for solve this problem you can extractStyle() inside a ".css" file and import the...

> ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9dc28c78-06fc-49f4-9cce-779c4293d08e) > > ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/853d4f26-1b9d-4513-9f81-c86733a7976e) > > ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/118deb4e-3567-4869-8a87-75aad128717f) > > This will only merge the extend configurations. Why is it set to undefined for something in particular? `extend` can be...

A workaround for this is to filter the list, but I have a feeling something needs to be fixed. ``` {renderFeedbacks(errors?.filter(e => e.level === "error"))} {renderFeedbacks(warnings?.filter(w => w.level === "warning"))}...

Of course I do that, but the object with level "warning" is added in both (errors and warning). The alternative solution seems to be a viable contingency for the moment

> This can only be rewritten with a new set of validation logic in the backend. If you use Node.js or Next.js, you can reuse the validation functions. > You...

> Validate admite async > > ``` > { > formMeta: { > render: renderValidateExample, > validateTrigger: ValidateTrigger.onChange, > validate: { > '*': async ({ value }) => ajx.xxx(...) >...