Fabio Batalha

@JGilbert-eLife The following elements should also be included in sec. * verse * disp-formula * disp-formula-group * graphic * tex-math * mml:math

@michael At first, what made us to take this decision and stick in relate-object to identify a fully reviewed document is like you said for display purpose and also because...

@JGilbert-eLife Last minute considerations. In some of our articles we have grouped examples, as for example: ``` xml 1 example 1 2 example 2 ```

@JGilbert-eLife We did a better evaluation of our corpus. There is only 2 articles with group of examples. We can ignore them. Feel free to remove this and the previous...

Technically I like this approach but it seems to be a huge change of paradigm once everybody is used to keep the translations in the elements designated to it (trans-title-group,...

Last minute user stories. (maybe it should be a separated issue to deal with group of figures) **What if** * I want to have a group of figures with title...

@JGilbert-eLife I think it is complete. The only comment I do is regarding the issue-title that could have translations. It means more then one issue-title can be available. ``` xml...

**User Stories** The same user stories for authors applies for the production staff. Including add and and removed bio notes. - As a production staff, I want to be able...

I would say those 3 groups are enough, and maybe change the name of **peer-review** to **editorial**. The CRedIT taxonomy doesn't address the translators, I would say it is ok...

Including one example with inline-graphic to support creative commons icons. ``` xml This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ```