guoshichao

@metan-ucw please help to check if the descibe info meet requirements, if not, I will modify them immediately. thank you

the current build break is fixed by: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/13717 which is still under review

> @extinguish @xuxin930 please take a look. this is fixed is https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14404, and is under review

> > @linguini1 @cederom please remove to change request to let merge this and the [apache/nuttx-apps#3224](https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3224) > > I won't remove my change request until proper test logs are provided....

> 1. Please refer to #17352 as the primary commit; @wangchdo submitted this change first. > 2. cc NuttX PMC and commiterrs, Please do not merge this PR, especially @xiaoxiang781216...

> > > The detailed implementation is different, both approach could benefit in the different usage. It's better to introduce the disable level concept, so both pr could be merged....

> @extinguish please fix the conflict ok, is fixed

> @extinguish there are some errors, i.e.: > > ``` > Configuration/Tool: lm3s6965-ek/qemu-protected,CONFIG_ARM_TOOLCHAIN_GNU_EABI > 2025-11-25 09:18:02 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Cleaning... > Configuring... > Disabling CONFIG_ARM_TOOLCHAIN_GNU_EABI > Enabling CONFIG_ARM_TOOLCHAIN_GNU_EABI > Building...

> @extinguish but the same error still report. Got it, I'm fixing it now, this is a new issue introduced by supporting the protect build process for mksym_tab.c.

> @extinguish but the same error still report. the "examples/elf project refactor and disable signal procedure" is separate to a new pull request, and the new pull request is based...