Esteban Zimanyi

Results 33 comments of Esteban Zimanyi

Alas, we haven't had time to solve this issue. More precisely, we currently don't have someone in the team with experience on this topic. We started looking at mingw64 and...

Many thanks Regina for your commitment to MobilityDB ! Esteban On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 5:40 AM Regina Obe ***@***.***> wrote: > @infotek I'm working on one. I plan...

Dear Regina I have started working on this issue and the problem comes from the PostGIS function ```lwgeom_unaryunion_prec``` embedded in MobilityDB https://github.com/estebanzimanyi/MobilityDB/blob/develop/postgis/liblwgeom/lwgeom_geos.c#L788 I have verified and the code has not...

Please take into account this comment https://github.com/MobilityDB/MobilityDB/pull/131#discussion_r684615693

Although we are planning to handle MobilityDB types natively in QGIS in the future, this is not in the current tasks that we are working on. There are technical reasons...

To have a more precise example you can compare the two following coverages https://coveralls.io/builds/42432062/source?filename=src%2Fgeneral%2Fskiplist.c https://coveralls.io/builds/42407603/source?filename=src%2Fgeneral%2Fskiplist.c The non-covered lines are exactly the same but one reports a coverage for the file...

Dear James Thanks so much for your detailed message. You may remember that you help me to set up Coveralls on Github actions https://github.com/lemurheavy/coveralls-public/issues/1567 and was so happy about that...

Many thanks for pointing out this issue! In order to reproduce it and work on it, do you think is it possible that you give us the data for the...

A simplified version of the query could be as follows WITH T(id,trip) as ( SELECT 1, tgeompoint 'SRID=3857;[Point(1000 ***@***.***:01:01, Point(1020 ***@***.***:01:02, Point(1040 ***@***.***:01:03]' UNION ALL SELECT 2, tgeompoint 'SRID=3857;[Point(1100 ***@***.***:01:05,...

> Hi, thanks for the review. I am using 1.0, is it possible this is different with develop? We have heavily modified the codebase from 1.0 to 1.1 in order...