esrauchg

@gazar Do you mind narrowing down the bug report here? Is 'fields' zero length? Is there an entry for 'tag' but it doesn't have a string value or has an...

I tried your repro snippet and don't see the issue reproduce in internal main tip. Can you clarify further the environment that you get the issue? If you're only able...

Can you provide the specific gcc version number that you're seeing the issue on? Thanks!

Sorry @antongrbin for the delays in getting someone to look at this! I can help review/push this forward here from the protobuf team. [Edit: removed questions that I realized weren't...

Drive by chiming in from someone on the Protobuf team at Google here. Unfortunately open sourcing the prototiller tool is held up so we still don't have a date for...

Can you clarify what information would be helpful in this context? Just to preface, Google is not proscriptive about open source protobuf implementations: we have our wire format spec and...

Ah; I think officially Protobuf is just not really optimal fit for wasm/FFI bridge style usecases; Protobuf is focused on ensuring behavior in the face of skewed schemas between sender/receiver...

> NB: ..Default::default() update syntax does not work with non-exhaustive structs. Maybe I'm misunderstanding but what I was thinking of does work, [here's an example in the Rust playground]( https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=01d0ca708b8d9a991066eeda6b34c04b)...

For anyone else coming across this, much of the conversation happened on the mailing list: https://groups.google.com/g/protobuf/c/4W-lFPqGnWM Continuing from the last reply there: > Personally, I do not mind the builder...

Our numbering scheme is that the major version is per-language (to decouple semver bumps to every language), and then the minor/point versions are the same numbering across all, and the...