Martin Alvarez-Espinar

I've been checking how similar specifications have dealt with tests and I like how the EPUB group does it. We cannot reuse the web-platform-tests directly because of the different nature...

I've worked on a proof of concept to show and explain what this approach would be like. As mentioned in [my previous comment](#issuecomment-1134378336), this methodology and system are based on...

This proposal was presented during the last CG and [WG meetings](https://www.w3.org/2022/06/30-miniapp-minutes.html#t03). No objections were raised, so I suggest we move forwards with this proposal so we can start testing as...

> Sounds good to me. Do you want me to create the repo? Yes, please.

Great, thank you!! We can leave this issue open to collect and discuss the ideas of the MiniApp validator discussed in previous meetings.

@QingAn, as I mentioned [last week](https://www.w3.org/2021/06/17-miniapp-minutes.html#t01), I was writing a document that included a use case for IoT. So I'm sharing the idea with you. The document, a [white paper...

I think we can close this issue. [MiniApp](https://www.w3.org/TR/miniapp-packaging/#dfn-miniapp) is the term we are using.

This document, now more solid, is informative and published by the CG (consensus at [TPAC meeting](https://www.w3.org/2023/09/14-miniapp-minutes.html)). I've also updated the charter (#202) to reflect this.

I think we can close this issue. We have the ongoing document and repository, and I included it also in the charter (#202). We can continue this work at https://w3c.github.io/miniapp-iot/

I think we can close this issue, since we have already included the [`MiniApp` definition](https://www.w3.org/TR/miniapp-packaging/#dfn-miniapp) and [in the White Paper](https://www.w3.org/TR/mini-app-white-paper/#what-is-miniapp).