erikreppel-cb

@kdenhartog totally agree privacy is going to be essential as stablecoin payments scale, for exactly the reasons you state. As of right now most chains do not have scalable private...

Hey thanks for taking the time to write this up! Agree with the premise that x402 should support smaller transactions in the future. Here are the issues I see with...

> exciting! > > some thoughts from me and some folks at vercel: > > * overall looks good > * signed identifier: it’s not clear to me where the...

Thanks for the thorough feedback! > There’s quite a bit of additional complexity that’s being introduced here with this proposal. Here’s some key considerations I’ve spotted so far: > >...

> Hey this is great, excited to see x402 evolve so rapidly. Happy to help where needed as well, I've been working on #426 for a while so became quite...

Hey folks, we're going to have a developer call on wednesday! RSVP here: https://luma.com/61teg2fe

Agree with this, markings as consider for next version as it'd be a breaking change

@mboorstin-circle this seems great! From what I gather from the gateway docs, circle is required participant for the gateway API (correct me if I'm wrong). If thats the case I...

@AmazingAng >https://github.com/coinbase/x402/pull/485#issuecomment-3448278738 Economics of a facilitator are market driven off chain (some facilitators may choose to charge SaaS fees to their customers)

@dragos-rebegea could you outline more about the specifics on multiversX? I'm not super familiar. It looks like this proposed mechanism uses something like sponsored transactions? Could you say more about...