Emanuele Gissi
Emanuele Gissi
Here is the link: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1_kDrv8UNshqSqL0QP2cqVFQ57r0R1FV0?usp=sharing
Sorry, should work now On Mon, Jun 21, 2021, 17:12 Kevin McGrattan ***@***.***> wrote: > The link requires permisssion. > > — > You are receiving this because you authored...
I confirm that in real world engineering practice I have never seen defining HCN as Simo was showing. I should add that in common cases, the visibility criteria always fails...
Yes, from a user perspective, It would be great!
Hi Dimitry @dsagal , this is indeed great news! Thank you for your hard work. A couple of days ago I've started using the feature in the 1.1.13 version. I...
> this first iteration doesn't include support for the `user` variable. Hopefully we can add that soon. Great news! Thank you.
This would be great!
Still researching. It seems to me that all I wrote in the previous post refers only to **single field validation**. **Record validation** is currently impossible, because, as soon as the...
The use of `AssertionError` seems very pythonic to me, so I love it. The `validation column` approach would be great.
As a workaround for record validation I am currently using a workflow approach. See the following example: https://docs.getgrist.com/kwXMUrkV3Rat/Workflow-example?utm_id=share-doc The `New` to `Approval` transition is how I do record validation.