Elba Raimúndez
Elba Raimúndez
And -- as a remark -- this is not an isolated case :( EDIT: Maybe the group of persons involved in the storage development can have a look?
> ..., and the test adjusted. @yannikschaelte For the second part, what would you have in mind? Just for the sake of testing the visualization function to, e.g. fix the...
Not yet, thanks for reminding.
Another thing/issue related to this question: When setting, e.g., different AMICI solver options one needs to do that on the `importer.create_objective()` object since there is not `amici_solver` field in the...
@EmadAlamoudi what is the status here?
I thought the plan was also to ask the authors ? How is the status on this ?
@MerktSimon what is the status on this model?
> The model doesn't appear to unscale the parameter, so estimating in `[-5, 3]` is incorrect, and instead should be `[0.00001, 1000]`. I see what you mean. However, the parameter...
> I believe this is an artifact from the d2d implementation where it seems like parameters can only be fixed on a linear scale (see for example reduced/regular version of...
@MerktSimon what is the status here?