Eric Kingery

> Thanks for your reply! I'll see how things with @ekingery and the go-track develop with their testing strategy, and keep it in mind to migrate to data providers in...

> I'm not well versed into the CLI code base. Maybe @ekingery could also take a look? I am missing some context. The description says: > This will eventually allow...

> > @RHL120 I appreciate your efforts in this PR. However, I am not convinced this refactor is A) a true refactor (tests confirming pre and post refactor functionality would...

We use [GoReleaser](https://goreleaser.com/) to create portable binaries and provide snap and homebrew packages. It stops short of distro-specific RPM packaging. For that, we would need to add a build step...

> Thanks Eric :) > > But, even if its hard (delayed) to get into the distro repos, we could at least provide the RPM packages for people to install...

> You must be referring to COPR when you say PPA (for PPAs are a thing in DEB-based distributions but not in RPM-based ones). I should be able to refer...

> @ekingery if you'd like to take a look at this and let me know if you see anything that's off, I'd appreciate it :) Thanks @Smarticles101! We're fully focused...

Hi everyone. The CI build failed on the previous versions of Go ("1.11.x", "1.12.x"). It passed on 1.15. We can update the Travis config to only build for more recent...

> Given the presence of `go.mod` and `go.sum` I assume that this is already a module. That's right. I meant upgrade the modules themselves. The build error, on first glance,...

> > Given the presence of `go.mod` and `go.sum` I assume that this is already a module. > > That's right. I meant upgrade the modules themselves. The build error,...