Edmundo Alvarez
Edmundo Alvarez
I also saw this while debugging an issue during testing day. I think we should also add a usage example to make it easier for a user to get started...
Also include documentation for new functions, as `rename_field` https://github.com/Graylog2/graylog-plugin-pipeline-processor/pull/50
FYI: A workaround is to delete the reference to the default content pack `00000000001`. Thank you @mpfz0r for the tip!
This is not that easy to achieve at the moment, or at least it would require some time to investigate and play with it. There is mainly one problem: -...
I think the main problem is exactly what you mentioned, @lennartkoopmann: at the moment we have three different libraries and I don't think it is possible to fix this issue...
Hi, Which Graylog version do you use? In 1.0 the index list loads in reverse order and it shows "up to", e.g. "Contains messages up to 22 days ago", so...
I looked at the times in the screenshot again and I was wrong regarding the indices order, I should probably drink some coffee :) I think this issue is related...
Oh, I see. I'll reopen the ticket and see what we can write there instead.
No, unfortunately it will not be part of v1.0.
Hi, Thank you for your request. On the search results page it is already possible to narrow down certain time frame by selecting the part of the histogram you are...