Eduard Staniloiu
Eduard Staniloiu
> I want to change this because it's brittle and it means that what on the surface appears to be a private implementation detail in DRuntime can't be changed without...
> Out of curiosity, what is the vision for how this will relate to [DMD clone.d](https://github.com/dlang/dmd/blob/67e8328f25d7c9733f83ad4c33226d2cb2c3a63b/src/dmd/clone.d)'s `buildXopEquals`/`buildXopCmp`/`buildXtoHash`? I might be wrong, but this will not cause trouble for `buildXopEquals`/`buildXopCmp`/`buildXtoHash`. The...
> > What do you think? > > I think it could be convenient. Syntax-wise it might be worth considering an approach based around annotating specific fields (either whitelist or...
@atilaneves is UDAs support required as part of this PR or can it come as a future PR?
@RazvanN7 I don't think there are any blockers for this PR. I've just rebased with master and pushed the updated branch. Let's see if the checks pass
I've been wondering lately if this should go in `std/experimental/typecons.d` until we are sure that the mixin interface is solid. This will prove to be the most useful for the...
This is bad. Good catch! > I suggest to introduce something like a `CheckingAllocator` We have `StatsCollector` which we can use; either as it is or to build `CheckingAllocator` on...
CC @jercaianu
I've moved the `parent()` logic inside the `mixin template Impl` as this also needs to infer the `shared` attribute.