Léo
Léo
> Why supporting C++ < 17? I see no practical reasons not to. do you mean "I see no reason to support C++14", or "I see no reason not to...
Thanks, @Ybalrid. Note that this will be less of an issue when get a proper cmake configuration.
- Cmake: build is done. we still need a proper install target and a cpp_sdl2-config.cmake, and it'll be done. I'm still looking for a way to set a list of...
This is the 1st run where it breaks: https://github.com/Edhebi/cpp-sdl2/actions/runs/143202036
Reproduced on an actual linux machine, it seems to be due to gcc being too old. Apparently, `` requires gcc>=9 https://godbolt.org/z/_YG6ji
@Ybalrid Interested by your opinion on this one : should we mandate gcc9, or conditionaly define the memory resource implementation on `__has_include()` ? we don't actually use the memory resource...
fwiw, this'd allow this part to compile on gcc starting from 7.5 at least (the one on the CI and latest on ubuntu repos): https://godbolt.org/z/vjx5Px
fixed by 80492327de970003cabfb51320729d7bb5b3ecc1
welp, looks like it brock CI. gotta investigate why `` can't be found, since we're using c++17 🤷
So, github actions are pretty nice, they replace travis, appveyor, and the pages script. I still gotta add macos and different platforms but this is promising. This is still on...