David Steele
David Steele
The best way to get a patch reviewed is to submit a PR.
> pgaudit is the only mainstream extension that requires a different version of itself for different major PostgreSQL versions There's a very specific reason for this -- we want to...
> Just have different tests and output for different versions of PG. I tried that -- it appears you can have different tests for different architectures but not different PG...
> I'm not sure this level of fanciness is required here, but it's an option. If we only support > PG10 we may not need it, but this is exactly...
Hmmm, the view is already being logged, so I the question is why it is being logged again. This may be something in the table list that needs to be...
Any progress on determining the cause of this?
If anything I think we'd want `pgaudit_role_exclude`, but I'm not sure I'm too excited about that either. It'd be easy for new objects to appear and start cluttering up the...
It's possible that there is some bad interaction between these two extensions. We've seen this in the past and generally it was an issue with the other extension. Hard to...
I've had a look through this patch and I can't see how it is functionally different than `alter user set ...`. We don't want two features that do essentially the...
> The proposal to use alter user/role set would work for normal user roles Should work for all non-superuser roles since the GUCs are SU_SET. > As a superuser one...