dullbananas
dullbananas
The current error type makes it hard to know whether it happened when reading or writing, and I want to handle those cases differently
I expected Option to be parsed like a normal enum, with one byte at the beginning that is set to 0 or 1 depending on whether or not a `Some`...
Maybe the `cond` attribute should be required on `Option` fields
no i don't know how to fix it. i gave up on weeb workers many months ago.
SQL is horrific
I only need `hash_raw` and `verify_raw`, which don't use base 64. I don't want to download and compile any crates that I don't need because it increases compile time and...
still present in 0.19?
That actually is breaking since it removes the record constructor function, and you can't use `Bar` in your own type annotations
i swear i saw it the other way around
it's been over a year