domist07

Yes, the lithology block model is correct, but the contact lines aren't cut off too.

No that's the reason why I run Ubuntu as a virtual machine. All Python files run on Ubuntu and I've the scikit image version 17-dev0, but that doesn't mask the...

The extend of the wohle project is: 187 x 1191 x 74 m The additional data: **Structure** isLith True isFault True number faults 2 number surfaces 6 number series 6...

How can I set the range of the variogram/covariance function? Is this the right command: `geo_data.modify_kriging_parameters('range', XXX)` ?

The Notebook regarding the problem: [https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/domist07/gempy/blob/master/notebooks/Issue322/Issue322.ipynb](https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/domist07/gempy/blob/master/notebooks/Issue322/Issue322.ipynb)

Yes that works, thank you! Therefore I've found the "initial" error: If I set `geo_data.orientations.df['smooth'] = 0.0001 # or smaller` after loading the orientations, the problem arrises 🤔. Independet what...

Yes, where the target surface is a horizontal plane. I also think that in 3D it will be much difficult, but in 2.5D it will be a nice feature.

No, I have contained little faults in some models, but I think too that an "vertical thickness" approach could work.

@MohammadCGRE thanks for the overview of possibilities! As soon as I have time, I will test it and report here.

Unfortunately no. Shall I send you or Leguark the data for replication?