Dominik Froehlich
Dominik Froehlich
Bump. Is there any movement on this? We're facing the exact same problem. So far we only thought of building our NATS clients in a way that they reconnect after...
@derekcollison interesting thought. In our case we don't know upfront about the number of client connections. So we cannot use a fixed number as we would drop any client that's...
@jrussett any updates on this PR? @geofffranks is there a way to re-trigger the CI?
@wlallemand Do you think this could be done with reasonable effort?
@andyast I have it in my backlog but haven't gotten around to do it yet. We might prioritize if there is higher demand for such a feature.
@oktalz thanks for the response. I see. I think the dataplane should be as feature complete as possible and cover all of haproxy configuration sections. So I think it would...
@andyast hi, just checking. did you have any success in writing the PR?
bump. can this be merged? hatop is broken since python3 has become de facto standard.
@jhunt thanks for taking this one! I think it might be useful for me, too. Will be watching the new repo if you need any help.
@jrussett bump. do you need help reviewing this?