David McClosky

Thanks, good to know! Could you send a pull request with the change?

Thanks for the information, @gangeli! If the next slf4j-less release is not too far out, I'm inclined to skip making 3.6.0 work out of the box since it would involve...

Thanks @gangeli. In that case, probably the easiest workaround (assuming you don't need exactly version 3.6.0 and are okay with an unreleased version) is to check out the [latest CoreNLP](https://github.com/stanfordnlp/CoreNLP/)...

Quite possibly, unfortunately. Are you using 3.6.0 or 3.7.0? (I don't think we ever really resolved it for 3.6.0, not sure if it's still a problem in 3.7.0)

Thanks for the report. Seems like there might be two things going on: First is that it's not able to import `JPypeBackend` (which is not necessarily bad, but might make...

Do you know if you have multiple versions of Java installed? It's possible that `jpype` was built against a different version than the main `java` binary in your path (I've...

Thanks for the report. Can you explain what you mean by "1.7 required" and "edited registry to 1.7"? Also, which version of the JRE is actually installed?

Can you send the full stacktrace for the "jre has value 1.8 but 1.7 required" error? PyStanfordDependencies on its own doesn't care about the JRE versions, it just tries to...

Hmm, sounds like having two different JREs on Windows is tricky. If it's at all possible, I would only have one version installed (though it sounds like StackOverflow users have...

It's a good question. PyStanfordDependencies doesn't actually know how to convert trees to dependencies, it just knows two different ways (subprocess and JPype) for calling the conversion code in Stanford...