divad1196

Results 14 comments of divad1196

@dmontagu Thank you for your response that saved me a lot of time I made a generic version if that helps anybody: ```python class MyBaseModel(BaseModel): def __init__(self, **data) -> None:...

Hi, I am having the same issue. For the moment, I fixed it by keeping track of the "single" clicks events myself (only works because the single-click event doesn't have...

Hi, I went with a quit similar proposal in another issue and thanks to @crw I landed up on this topic. I was wondering why this topic went idle for...

Hi and thank you for your interest in this module. This module does **not** aim to substitute the rpc protocol but to provide a better read, and secondly create/deletet/write, support...

@ooraini Regarding the comment, I apologize for the confusion. Currently, the method to create a record is `create` and the one to update it is `write`, and the idea would...

Hi, I opening a discussion instead and closing this issue. The reason are: 1. I feel like issues are not encouraging the discussion 2. Issues sounds like "There is a...

Hi, I don't have much time during the day but here is a first response: The standard support mutation deletion. I don't remember meaning that you **never** need the result,...

@adar2378 I answered somewhere that the deletion is not that useful for graphql. This is also what is mentionned in @swolf91 first comment. If you want to delete something, use...

Hi, The module is not meant to by-pass Odoo and you shouldn't do it. I have seen 2 teams try it and face major lawsuits because they exposed sensitive data....

No, I understood what you said. What you want is to bypass Odoo, i.e. the **security level**. It is indeed faster, but you expose yourself to security risks. I saw...