dhaus67

This might be interesting to you @nabokihms , as it is somewhat similar to #2430 .

@nabokihms thanks for the feedback. I can see why we don't want to expose a public interface for that as well. I've gone the way you mentioned with regards to...

@nabokihms @sagikazarmark any update on your end regarding this?

Hey! Thanks for filing this. To give more context to this: the reason for the file being removed temporarily is due to an issue with the k[ube-linter-action](https://github.com/stackrox/kube-linter-action/issues/17) that occurred with...

I've got an update regarding this: Starting with the current release (0.5.0), we have changed the release assets. This included removing all archives as release assets. The `kube-linter-linux.tar.gz` is kept...

@mtrmac Thanks for the info and additional context. I'm guessing there's not really a workaround available for this, and looking at the time when the issue is created, we seem...

@jumbosushi any interest in finalizing this PR? If not, I'll take this one over after some time, since I feel like this is a good configuration to have.

* **#10886** 👈 * `master` This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. Join @dhaus67 and the rest of your teammates on Graphite

* **#10934** 👈 * `master` This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. Join @dhaus67 and the rest of your teammates on Graphite

* **#10906** 👈 * `master` This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. Join @dhaus67 and the rest of your teammates on Graphite