Devrim
Devrim
any update/ETA on this ?
@vfdev-5 Thanks for the comment. I've looked over #1056 (and [this comment](https://github.com/pytorch/ignite/issues/1056#issuecomment-639895281) spesifically). I think the order of write/remove is popped out out of scope for #1056. I feel that...
> I'd say if we would not do that, clearml users would have 2 checkpoints instead of 1 if n_saved=1. This is temporarily though, am I right ? (Only until...
> Actually starting version (v1.0.0) there is now an API to delete remote files (even on the default http server). This means that now ClearML will be able to support...
@vfdev-5 yeah, I'd like to. I can try to look at this in a while (probably in a week or two), but if any volunteer is ready to take on...
Well with the following, we can simply reverse the order to write/remove and not implementing "lazy saving" (atomic would cover this I believe). > Actually starting version (v1.0.0) there is...
I opened a PR which can be a first draft for > Well with the following, we can simply reverse the order to write/remove and not implementing "lazy saving" (atomic...
@rodrigovimieiro I'm not a maintainer, nor a contributer, but have you tried `model.cuda()` as input ?
@nficano Any ETA on this ? This is blocking our next release https://github.com/obss/sahi/issues/505
@dvsrepo Any updates on this ? Current nltk version is 3.6.5, is there any plan to update the package by supporting the latest nltk (or 3.6+) ? Is it in...