Denodo Research Labs

[CVE-2024-1135](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-1135) is reported as `HIGH` by some security tools like PRISMA. Will this version bump be applied to the 3.1-x branch too to avoid that CVE affecting current stable versions?

[CVE-2024-4340](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-4340) is reported as `HIGH` by some security tools like PRISMA. Will this version bump be applied to the 3.1-x branch too to avoid that CVE affecting current stable versions?

As @michael-s-molina commented on #29927 that new features can only be accepted for 4.1, we are focusing on this PR. We've just added a couple of changes to the db_engine_spec...

@betodealmeida Any guidance on how to perform the compatibility tests and updating the automated report in https://github.com/apache/superset/blob/master/superset/db_engine_specs/README.md? Are we meant to execute `superset db-test ` and then manually update the...

Just checking: anything else needed from our side? Are those modifications on `superset/db_engine_specs/README.md` a requirement? If so, any guidance on how to perform them?

We are trying to make plans regarding Superset support in some of our components: is there any possibility that this gets included in 4.1?

@villebro PR rebased on master, added unit tests.

Just added a new commit to make the automated PR code checks happier: replaced `== None` with `is None` in the unit test.

Any chance this PR can get the review it still needs before 4.1 is out? This affects our plans for the integration of Apache Superset with some parts of our...

Thanks @villebro Isn't this the error that is being reported by the linter? ``` ************* Module superset.db_engine_specs.denodo superset/db_engine_specs/denodo.py:28:0: R0903: Too few public methods (0/2) (too-few-public-methods) ``` But there's not much...