Dirk Brömmel
Dirk Brömmel
> Is there a plan to merge this PR soon? It would really help our users. I'd also like to see this PR merged. Just did a quick test and...
Resolves #153 and #168. The solution proposed in #168 seems much nicer though.
It does *not* seem to break in the other direction, i.e. replacing towards c-relations, e.g. '.gt.' to '>'.
Please refer to #63, #52, and possibly #101. If you switch to `END DO` instead of `CONTINUE` it feels a little more modern, is supported, and you can still use...
I think that's similar to #153. And your change appears to be much shorter than my proposed solution, so I'd vote for that. I'd hope my proposed changed test still...
#154 is my uglier fix. The test is pretty basic, I've simply adjusted the existing one to catch this case as well I believe. But I've also seen in #127...
I've added a simple test in #152, at least for `SELECT CASE`. But I assume this PR does the trick just as well.
I think this is similar to #152 or #170. My suggested fix did however miss to fully fix the `SELECT RANK|TYPE`. Whichever is included would be an improvement, I guess?
I'm not entirely sure, all I can go by is #127. I am currently using it off my fork as well.
Sounds like a duplicate of #155.