davidsgrogan
davidsgrogan
> it seems pretty clear that in the case of the .small containers, the align-content: normal and align-content: stretch are to behave as align-content: flex-start I assume you're referring to...
Heh, I also just noticed that the test was multi-line.
Yes, impossible to have more than one flex line in the context of positioning an abspos child of a flex container. I agree with that final sentence.
I agree that these min-width-auto tests assert incorrect behavior.
Oops didn't mean to close
I see same using Debian server with macOS client.
> So: these keywords are specced to behave as `auto` in the block axis, basically. I think that is not the intent of the spec, based on https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3973#issuecomment-705663905 and the...
I think we are supposed to honor `height: min-content` also, but I can't come up with a case where that matters since in the block direction min-content size == max-content...
I agree with (a), (b), (d), (e) without reservation. I don't disagree with (c), I just don't understand its relevance. I don't necessarily disagree with (f) either, I just want...
> It could be, but it feels like a potentially arcane way of doing that. If we want to address that use-case, perhaps there's a more direct way to do...