David Gordon
David Gordon
> looks good to me. does the helm chart get built correctly? Can we make sure this config looks like the other operators? Unfortunately, it breaks the Helm side. ```...
It seems like the certificate being issued looks properly configured if the operator was installed to the `openshift-operators` namespace. But given that the service monitor seems to target a service...
Ah okay thanks for the clarification then @cigna-asoria I'm going to see if I can recreate the issue, sounds like it should be pretty easy to recreate. The only things...
Yes, so for context. When installing via Helm, we provide cert-manager support because we're making an assumption (sometimes it's a bad assumption) that users using Helm are probably targeting plain...
So I think it doesn't look right to me, because I thought this operator is installed in the `cert-utils-operator` namespace, and the DNS on the cert would lead me to...
> @davgordo - cert-utils is installed under `openshift-operators ` **not** `cert-utils-operator` - that is why i think we are running into this issue. Ah hah! My apologies for misunderstanding. So...
Now we're cookin'. Server name is wrong there. Thanks for all your help with the extra info. The problem is clear now. We'll have to do some brainstorming for a...
@cigna-asoria actually, I don't know for sure whether OLM creates that service monitor automatically... Did you all configure that, or was that provided by the operator provisioning?
> @davgordo - No, we did not configure that. We only upgraded/installed cert-utils instances through OperatorHub UI via the OpenShift Console. My take is that OpenShift deployed it. Ah I...