Michał Darowny
Michał Darowny
Could I have look at it ? Or is it completed/fixed?
If I understand correctly the simplest solution would be to hardcode tuple with {pid, erl_anno:new(0), ''} as a return in pick_value? Is this a similar case to the ?type(range) case...
The quickest and most clean in either cases seems like `lists:flatten(erl_pp:expr({value, erl_anno:new(0), self() })).` Could this be okay? Instead of `call` just put `value` and `self()` or ``
> @VincentVanBork Interesting. I didn't know this absform existed. It seems to work! Is it documented anywhere? > > ```erlang > 9> lists:flatten(erl_pp:expr({value, erl_anno:new(0), self() })). > "" > ```...
@erszcz for me yes I like that it is value and not pattern.
Hello, do you need help with test coverage?
What is wrong with porting mimalloc? Why it can't be used?
I would like to try this
@anonrig do you have anything specific in mind ? or should I just investigate and try to find something ?
I looked briefly and I am not sure what can be done directly in ada:can_parse Maybe: 1. removing allocations in the parse_url itself and url_aggregator? 2. changing parse signature to...