Daniel Starns
Daniel Starns
Ref: https://github.com/prisma/client-planning/issues/30
Is there a way we could fold this work directly into the functional test suite so that we have memory tests for all our existing tests? It looks to me...
I would like to chime in and mention that we left MERGE out for a few reasons; firstly, you need to MERGE on two unique fields and so that implies...
Hello. Thank you for sharing your usage here. We realize that not supporting unions and interfaces the same way is causing some issues & will get back to you with...
Hey @smkhalsa ! The state of this had not changed and we still don't have a solution. Apologies for the time this is taking.
Hi @dmoree . Thank you for taking the time to write this up! `additionalLabels` is something we have not yet ported over from `neo4j-graphql-js` but of course, something we need...
Hi @smkhalsa. Still no change, sorry to hear it's blocking your migration.
@smkhalsa We are not actively working on this, it's being put aside until we come to a solution for relationship properties and relay, as we think there is going to...
> @danstarns you stated "As it stands, on fields, you can use Unions" -- can you please point to a working example of such a union on a field? Then...
Field level interfaces have been released in 2.4.0 and are available on npm. Top-level is something we are still planning and shaping.