Daniel Tabacaru
Daniel Tabacaru
@nicola-cab @fealebenpae I looked at the code in `SyncSession::shutdown_and_wait()` and changing it does not seem straightforward. I agree the proposed fix will mostly be effective if only one session/realm is...
Hi @xiles. Thank you for reporting this. We are looking into it. It would help if you could share your realm file with us, either here, or privately at [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]).
Thank you. We'll take a look.
@papafe No worries
> Should we expose the new Action enum to the C API? Also are there any tests we could write for this? I guess we should expose it such that...
> Can we add a test for this? I am working on it. I didn't want to hold back the review while doing that :)
FYI: There is one last sync test failing pending a fix.
> FYI: There is one last sync test failing pending a fix. This proved to be a server issue. Since it may take a while for them to fix it,...
> Has the server merged in their fixes for this? Looks like the test for this is still failing on a few variants. No. It is going to be a...
@nirinchev A lot has changed since this issue was filled. We now have seven categories of errors based on the action the server sends: https://github.com/realm/realm-core/blob/master/src/realm/sync/protocol.hpp#L215-L221. Some of the errors have...