danielleodigie

Results 6 comments of danielleodigie

This looks pretty good to me, just a quick question: if there a reason to declare both a `cycles_edges` and a `cycles_nodes` if from what I understand we only return...

> > if there a reason to declare both a cycles_edges and a cycles_nodes if from what I understand we only return one or the other? Is it possible in...

oops I didn't know that, I'd like to be assigned too!

This is what I get when I run the results from run_bv.py with fidelity: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/97267313/179776127-d5ed762b-174a-4170-a5b4-44552afdad71.png)

> I used the visualization code and it no longer works. I noticed that you said that you added dual file comparison, but that wasn't the issue that I was...

> It's more so that the names of the benchmarks aren't displayed in a legible manor > ![Figure_1](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/39884062/182652733-6621583b-2d18-4571-b109-2e5d780d1399.png) > I believe that this could be fixed by redesigning the graph...