Daniel Burckhardt
Daniel Burckhardt
Comment from @fedekunze: > We'd need to define the use cases and scope of work for this. Would we need to fork the SDK like osmosis did?
@ramirocarlucho Lets try to avoid forking the sdk
@facs95 we moved it back to Todo, since there is no draft PR yet. Is there any work done here already?
I'm generally experiencing weird behaviour with setting the --gas flag: It seems like transactions up to around --gas=124000 gas fail, even though there gasLimit for normal transactions is much lower...
seems that an old, uncompleted version is already supported: https://github.com/etclabscore/ethereum-json-rpc-specification [ethereum-json-rpc-specification.org/](http://ethereum-json-rpc-specification.org/) https://etclabscore.github.io/core-geth/JSON-RPC-API
https://github.com/tharsis/evm-json-rpc-spec
There are some occurrences of `feeSplit` that were missing, let me push some missing replacements
@fedekunze I separated the test suite refactor into [this ticket](https://linear.app/evmos/issue/ENG-939/refactor-common-test-suite-setup-into-a-clear-test-util)
> > @yihuang can you add a PR description about what users can do with this? > > done. sorry I didn't follow up closely on this PR, because we...
@yihuang isn't the test with empty code hash still missing? ``` emptyCodeHash := crypto.Keccak256(nil) codeHash := common.BytesToHash(emptyCodeHash).String() ```