Charles Treatman

GitHub says it's not going to run the tests for this PR until a maintainer approves them.

Is there any way a maintainer can allow the test jobs to run so we can confirm if this PR is mergeable? I ran the tests locally and they passed,...

Any updates on this? I'm pretty sure this passes all of the tests, but I the PR checks won't run unless a maintainer allows them to run. We continue to...

Based on the description you are likely running up against #26. There are a couple PRs under review that would address that issue, but in the meantime one way to...

@rickardl could you clarify your earlier comment on the support model: >But the project isn't dead, we're just a bit distracted by our daily work, my organisation is moving towards...

Thank you for clarifying! Improving the tests to make it easier to accept contributions sounds like a good approach for unblocking some of the pending contributions here. My suggestion to...

Any thoughts on this? We've been using it for a while now to allow us to define separate workflows for release branches and feature development branches; using the `pr` resource...

I haven't run performance tests on this change yet. We ran a couple pipelines with this implementation to confirm that it worked as expected, but given that the resource at...

@rickardl I pushed a build with this feature to Docker Hub as [ctreatma/github-pr-resource:no-date-filter](https://hub.docker.com/layers/ctreatma/github-pr-resource/no-date-filter/images/sha256-0615ac6b66108603e7a1c638c957662362491b85e5571efc5a75894d7ffc5577?context=explore). I'm a bit out of my wheelhouse with performance testing a Concourse resource but happy to dig...

@rickardl I haven't had a chance to figure out local performance testing of this change, but we've been using it for a couple months now with no issues thus far....