Kim Wittenburg

Hi @samdoran, thanks for working on this! I am eagerly waiting for this PR to be merged. As per your message in #4415 I just tested the current implementation and...

> Looking the v2 schema for sections, there is no value field, so I'm not sure it makes sense to allow sections in the v2 CLI. Maybe we could warn...

> I meant that the value of sections doesn't contain any values Ah ok, now I got it. Thanks! > "section" doesn't iterate through "sections" in the output but should...

Hi, I just stumbled across this issue and was wondering whether there has been any progress on this. In my case I want to generate certificates with multiple `Organization` fields....

Hey, thanks a lot for the suggestion. I’m not sure yet which style I prefer. On one hand I kind of like not having a nested class. Especially improved IDE...

That's a really good resource, thank you. I'm actually thinking more about edge cases that are relevant when implementing parsers for the format. Consider these two examples: ``` # VERSION...

No news from me. I didn't really prioritize this over the last year. However, I'm still interested in this and hope to be able to create a PR for some...

I also don't see much value in these badges, but I'm not opposed to them. I guess it doesn't hurt to have them available and see if people want to...

I finally found the time to revisit this PR. I'm sorry for the delay. I'm marking this PR as ready for review now. Those are very good points @Baklap4. Especially...

Is there currently a proposed or accepted feature that significantly changes the syntax of the format? If not I think it would be easier to annotate each of the header...