Adrian Cole
Adrian Cole
thanks for raising this! one note to bear in mind that unless we change the entire layout a "follows from" that crosses services (aka a producer/consumer) would be indistinguishable from...
Spoke with @garyd203 and @sirtyro here at Tyro. Right now, in lieu of this, they are cleverly propagating send timestamp, then on the receiver side adding that as an annotation...
note: I still owe a change to make those numbers better (#3192).. we should be counting entry spans (local roots) not ad-hoc spans. That said, the UX wouldn't change
I'll also note that in design cases we aren't using a trace with a large amount of service names. The earlier design (bucketing by first letter) could equally be done...
> typically we have large number of spans and not large number of services.. how many services are you looking at any trace with more than 20 service names would...
It has been a long time since we cut a version and we need to.. We should decide soon if what's in master is ok, if this should be included,...
thanks for the offer @llinder!
First, let's remember this is about testing not releasing. so building an image on PR and testing that. > What's the "separate project"? Sorry I meant separate maven module, similar...
neat thing is we can have multiple actions anyway :) so we could test both approaches heh
yep IDE is convenient, and relevant when the images are actually tested in there :) note: I have no plans to use any sort of plugin based dockerfile generation thingies...