Adrian Cole

actually, I have doubts, too.. Since #232 is implemented, aren't entry points required to have an `@Inject` annotation (or be supplied via `@Provides`)? If that's the case, isn't this issue...

+1 On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Jesse Wilson [email protected]: > +1. > > — > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/square/dagger/issues/288#issuecomment-19846241 > .

per issue #252, my main desire is for prioritized contributed bindings. I also like and would use Map bindings, and will think about it to see if this would work...

I'm in favor of the first option, particularly for a configuration api, it is more important to me that the value can be complex than its key. ``` @Provide(type=MAP_VALUE) @Key("foo")...

All my current use cases are fine with "worst" fwiw. I also like the less types thing, and am ok with the extra key attribute on the Provides annotation only...

I've been playing around quite a bit, and one thing that seems quite easy (in principle) to do with map bindings, but not in set bindings, is to override by...

If we want to investigate this further we probably should: - [ ] backfill test of `ModuleAdapterProcessor.generateModuleAdapter()`. This will easily help show any codegen differences if we take any action...

fyi I'm doing something like this because it seems spring boot norms are to encode the password in the URL. ```java URI serviceUrl = URI.create(eurekaUri); BasicToken auth = null; //...

Up vote On Tuesday, July 23, 2013, jeremy franklin-ross wrote: > up vote. > > — > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/Netflix/karyon/issues/41#issuecomment-21437723 > .

just bumped into this, too. This isn't idiomatic: the primary consumer of a pom is maven, it should be marked compile as we can't use it otherwise. If folks are...