Peter Gafert
Peter Gafert
I implemented a simplified version in #1280. Since I have no capacity to work on this further, I'm gonna close this. Feel free to reopen if you want to pick...
I implemented a simplified version in #1280. Since I have no capacity to work on this further, I'm gonna close this. Feel free to reopen if you want to pick...
Sorry, somehow I completely dropped the ball on this, since there was no further reaction and nobody every reported the problem again 🙈 But somehow I stumbled over this ancient...
Glad to hear that it's still gonna be useful 🙂
Sorry for being so slow with this! It just interfered a little with the 1.0.0 release (+ bug fixes :grimacing:) and I only wanted to consider new features for 1.1.0....
There is actually an issue with a similar focus: https://github.com/TNG/ArchUnit/issues/66 Some parts seemed unfeasible, like configuring a threshold for violations (since you can run the tests too individually), but I...
Yes, people would not be able to reference their **custom** rule as a **preconfigured** rule, but would have to use a configurable rule :wink:. For me this seems like a...
I think the basic problem is to combine those conditions all in one rule, i.e. what fails is that you say "classes that reside in a package '..entity..' should have...
Would you consider your problem then solved for now? 🙂
Sorry for the late reply, I think it would be a nice addition, if anybody wants to give this a shot I would support it! In the past we've already...