code-ghalib
code-ghalib
Hi @aantron, this may be a non-issue on account of a misunderstanding on my part, but how does the vendoring in of `libuv` play out in the following scenario: -...
> As I understand it, code shouldn't be linked against two versions of libuv or two instances of libuv at all. > > Ideally, the whole project could be configured...
Consider using https://github.com/Chris00/ocaml-csv
Hi @mseri thanks for looking into it - I'm using cohttp 5.0.0. It's not easy for me to try `tls-lwt` unfortunately - internal system package manager (not opam) doesn't have...
Sorry @mseri for the delay in responding. I have tried to get you some more information to help identify the issue. Here's the relevant snippet of the output of `strace`:...
Thanks @mseri - the size miscalculation is just speculation on my part. Your theory sounds a lot more plausible - I should be able to try a modified `ocaml-ssl` and...
Hi @mseri - sorry for the delay, I finally got some time to look into this. I used a modified version of `ocaml-ssl` and it did not work to fix...
This is not exactly the same request, but it would be nice if it were possible to point the extension to a `/non/opam/path/bin` to look for all the binaries it...
I wonder if we can get rid of the `Min/Max` distinction, let the comparator decide the order, and call the "best" element the `top` of the queue? So only the...
> Thanks for the feedback @code-ghalib ! Initially, I did that, but it happened confusing (what is the meaning of "best"? is this "min" or "'max"? and so on). See...