chriss-de
chriss-de
Hi I'm interested in this feature too. Considering your question if we can have it as proper annotation and not as snippet - how would that work. there is use...
@strongjz can you explain why that patch that took almost a year to get reviewed has been removed without a mention on why? Will it be added back? We _need_...
Use controller version 1.10+ - the patch to disable proxy_intercept_errors is available there
1. This may be Linux specific. But seems logical. A negative User ID (or for that matter signed user ID) makes no sense - at least to me. 2. This...
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_identifier states it is a 32bit integer](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_identifier#Type) According to this in 2001 Linux switched to 32bit and it is unsigned. Now - assuming there is a reason to have a...
to quote your source (updated document) https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/ - nlink_t, uid_t, gid_t, and id_t shall be integer types. - blkcnt_t and off_t shall be signed integer types. It states to be...
I'd like to add to my previous thought why uid should not be handled as unsigned. After all the uid is an integer with 32bit - the rest is representation...
I have the same problem. For me this looks like a new network driver - sth like "brat" as in bridge attach I have a (and only one) bridge interface...
yes - pretty much what I would need for my use case. the less changes on the existing bridge the better.
This ’mode=unmanaged’ - is it available in a version or is it just in main?