Cara (Haas) Silverstein

Thanks @mjibson !

@guswynn Both items in the todo list are complete, so marking this as done.

@benesch I found another one - should `mz_peek_active` be `mz_active_peeks` or `mz_peeks_active` at least?

Hi @andrioni. I have a few clarifying questions 1) Since you mentioned dates, I wanted to confirm the needed function is the numerical `trunc` (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-math.html) and not `date_trunc` (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-datetime.html#FUNCTIONS-DATETIME-TRUNC). 2)...

Added support for single-param `trunc` function. Confirmed with @andrioni that Tableau only needs the single param function. Feel free to re-open or create a new ticket if we end up...

The full suite of system tables using `materializations` is: ``` mz_materializations mz_materialization_dependencies mz_worker_materialization_frontiers mz_worker_materialization_source_frontiers mz_worker_materialization_delays mz_materialization_frontiers mz_materialization_source_frontiers ```

Thanks @frankmcsherry ! @benesch Are you in agreement to use the `mz_collection` prefix? I'm going to go ahead and start these changes. I agree it's not quite a relation (we...

Finally getting to this now that #14559 is merged. As per the conversation on that PR, the proposed prefix from @vmarcos is `mz_compute` with the use of `import` and `export`...

Synced offline - we're not sure about exposing the term "compute", but we'll move forward with these changes since this seems like the best option for now.

That's my understanding too. Figured I'd finish this ticket for posterity since we already did most of the work, but we will be able to make more changes down the...