cbrockington

Results 4 comments of cbrockington

The current proposal seems to rely a lot on preexisting shared knowledge between the client and server of what formats are "widely supported". If this is going to be the...

Of course, and it's done so in my examples, though the `Content-Type` hasn't be supported by the server, so it `415`s as described here https://github.com/palantir/conjure/pull/115/files#diff-2afc5a418c204e19d6756d4847a084c0R50. Unless `request format` refers to...

We would probably need some content as to ensure there are no unexpected deserialization errors, but I think the restriction in the RFC need be no more than "something deserializable...

As I said, there is no reason for the content to be empty, it can and should be something which deserializes with that content type (which depending on the format,...