Andy Adinets
Andy Adinets
delayed, as Darwin doesn't implement unnamed semaphores. It may be possible to use libdispatch semaphores instead, but this will require further consideration
In my case, the decoupled look-back implementation is different in at least 2 aspects from the generic one. - Instead of a single decoupled look-back, a large number of decoupled...
No, I don't expect much benefit for the case where only a single decoupled look-back is performed.
At the very least, my implementation could use a similar interface. Regarding using `TilePrefixCallbackOp` and `ScanTileState` (or versions thereof) in my case, it's possible provided that it doesn't negatively affect...
Just a small comment: #4655 alone won't fix this. Some other pull requests will need to follow, e.g. for treelite import, Python support, and integration with random forest prediction.
I've addressed the review comments. Could you take another look?