Caio Lima
Caio Lima
> @caiolima Do you have plans to respond to the feedback on this PR? Oops, I feel this got lost in my notification list for quite a while. I'm quite...
This feels like a bug in the current private fields spec. But one thing that's confusing me is the part `...and the derived |UnaryExpression| is...`. It is not clear to...
I also have the intuition that BigDecimal should follow Strings and BigInts there and be implementation-specified. Let's imagine we support `BigDecimal("0.121...")`, how would we handle a given string that is...
I think we can consider another option there, that is to use Ruby-like approach (i.e choose an arbitrary amount of extra decimal places) when the result is a non-terminated expansion...
I'm not in favor of allowing this, at least in the scope of this proposal. Hexadecimals are majorly used with integer in mind and I don't see compelling use cases...
I think it is a fair modification. As @bterlson pointed that it confuses debugging a code, I can imagine cases that aren't common, but can be written, when constructor has...
Hi all, could someone help me trigger CI again, please?
I'm getting permission errors to look what is failing on CI. Probably it already expired. Does any of you have permission to see what's failing?