Cedric H. David

@yunks128, thanks for opening this thread! My perspective here is as a research scientist who practices and embraces open science, while recognizing and trying to alleviate some of its challenges...

# Expectations ## Our metrics of success This piece of software is developed with FUNDING obtained through competitive grant proposals by scientific researchers for whom there are three primary metrics...

@ifenty, I like your suggestion and there is great value in being inviting rather than forbidding. I think at the root of my draft version of that sentence is that...

@PaulMRamirez, your suggestion of using the term "Commitment to Open Science" is a very good one. Your choice of words for "Attributions" and the descriptions related to "inclusive research", "inclusive...

@PaulMRamirez, I read the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity with great interest. The chapter on collaborative working is exactly along the lines of what we're discussing here, particularly...

To further feed the conversation, here is an excerpt from a paper I wrote a few years ago (https://doi.org/10.1002/2015EA000142): > Finally, and contrary to common belief, open source software does...

@PaulMRamirez, @yunks128, thanks for fostering this conversation! I love the idea of opening a cross post with TOPS to welcome a broader range of feedback. In the meantime, I've done...

> Great discussions! I would like to start a document that describes what we have discussed. The title and scope are to be updated (code of conduct, expectations, acknowledgments, etc.)...

@yunks128, @PaulMRamirez, FYI: I leveraged your code from https://github.com/yunks128/slim/blob/main/docs/guides/governance/contributions/code-of-conduct/EXPECTATIONS.md. I cleaned up some of the text and formatting in a way that worked better for me, and I also ran...