Bastian Waidelich

I think this question can only be answered if you know the _intentions_ of the change: a) It's a critical new invariant that has to be enforced by all means...

> But why create a new value object? Because, if you ignore the new constraints you don't gain anything from them. You might reply: Yes, I'll gain that the new...

Thanks, I think this is a great approach! I'm just wondering: From the description and code I cannot tell directly where exactly to set this option, i.e. is this configurable...

Allow my to repeat my [POV from last October](https://neos-project.slack.com/archives/C050C8FEK/p1633952681451500?thread_ts=1633942822.443900&cid=C050C8FEK): > Yes, editors should not be able to simply delete/disable nodes at their will. But IMO that's the responsibility of the...

I would suggest to make "link types" an explicit (and extensible) concept. This would allow us to provide (or reuse) a dedicated editor for each type:   Also folks...

> Your scribble is basically the good old TYPO3 linkeditor ;) Yep, that's what I had in the back of my head :) Though the TYPO3 link editor is a...

> Maybe you meant this Discuss post Yes, I think that was it. Thanks for linking!

> I like the concept but not the tabs I agree. In the mockups above the tabs should just represent multiple exclusive contexts > It makes sense to specify what...

FYI: https://github.com/sitegeist/Sitegeist.Archaeopteryx implements a great deal of features in a separate package

> Any plans or workaround to support DateTimeRangeValidator in Neos 7.3 I don't have any, but I would hope that we'll be able to support all core (and custom!) validators...