Becky Sweger

@jsfenfen Thank you for weighing in and for taking a deep dive into the various DATA Act artifacts. Agreed that your proposal to link to data definitions as a first...

Hi @rebeccawilliams -- thanks for weighing in. You're right: the `...` icon will eventually surface the data download function. We're removing the icon for launch to prevent confusion. As an...

Thanks for the report. We're aware of the issue and have an open story in our backlog to address it: https://federal-spending-transparency.atlassian.net/browse/DS-1047

Thanks for opening this! I was thinking specifically about data that's definitively, well-and-truly retired. Which seems hard to know for sure unless an agency or subject matter expert weighs in....

@HerschelC Thanks for this idea. Federal spending is complex, and ideas for making the DATA Act understandable to all audiences are welcome. I've flagged this for the team to consider...

@HerschelC Thanks for your suggestion. I'll make sure that it's included when the next round of feedback is submitted to the DATA Act Inter-agency Advisory Committee.

Just want to second @Solomon’s great input and add my own .02. During my time at [National Priorities Project](http://nationalpriorities.org), an org that makes the federal budget accessible to regular citizens,...

The advice of @JimHarperDC to “sanely scope the first phase” makes a lot of sense. His proposed “skeletal view,” if implemented correctly, would help people like @Solomon drill into specific...

Though not directly related to the data standards, it would be helpful to know if there are plans to include any derived/calculated elements in the next iteration of federal spending...

Welcome, @ecyiing! Is this a question about using the data that's currently on USAspending.gov? If so, the best way to get an assist is to post a new issue on...