Brian J. Miller
Brian J. Miller
Can't the AP already do this with State? Or any of the document APIs, or a combination of them?
Yep, or any other key they so desire. The bottom line being, the AP(s) can store whatever they like, that could be a history of launched registrations, requiring the key...
I :+1: @garemoko comments in 1a. Though would also go so far as to say that voiding could work in that case as well, though the purist in me thinks...
In so far as data ownership is a hot topic I don't think it is possible to say that the user "owns" the data. Internal corporate training organizations would likely...
I should have also commented on the "real" world scenarios. I definitely think the spec is the wrong place for that. Blog posts, example apps, code snippets, mailing lists, even...
Except the original concern of the "user" owning their data comes down to identifying the "user", cause that _can't_ be just the "actor". So is it the "authority"? In the...
@berthelemy depends on the reason for needing to remove an item, but in general, yes, voiding is for statements that shouldn't have existed to begin with. I think you'll run...
I don't think there is any change needed here for this request. If the client is using a 'Content-Length' header then it was explicitly set since the library itself doesn't...
FWIW, http://experienceapi.com/deep-dive-object/
I like the accept-language idea as a pass to this method, not sure how hard the parsing is but can look into that. The second discussion probably begs a new...