Brandur

Any thoughts on adding this to the README? It's a pretty serious gotcha. I looked into improving the error message, which would probably be my first preference, but I guess...

I ran into this as well. I took a quick look through the source to see if it might be possible to tell what's going on, but nothing seems obviously...

> Agreed with the future tag here, as this is something that we cannot do today. I hesitate to add this feature as it ties stripe-ruby directly to a specific...

Aside: it's interesting to note as well that the [unofficial .NET Stripe SDK](https://github.com/jaymedavis/stripe.net#stripe-api-version) already took the approach of pegging an API version.

@jensljungblad Oof, I hate to say it, but although this briefly became possible around V2 where you could reach into the library's default connection and modify Faraday options, it's now...

Hi everyone, thanks a lot for logging this and the follow-up discussion. Language bindings are certainly a feature we want to provide, but we have a few other dependencies that...

Actually, we're going to re-open this issue to ease tracking. Tagging as ~~"speculative"~~ "future" for now. Apologies for the churn!

Hi @MarkMurphy, thanks for keeping us accountable here! So the answer is not completely satisfying: yes, there's been movement on the front, but we're still not particularly close to an...

@MarkMurphy Okay, thanks! Will definitely keep you appraised is anything more substantial comes about.

I'd consider a PR on that one, but I don't personally have enough direct experience with 3rd party stubs to be able to recommend any in particular.