bmeisels
bmeisels
Considering what I learned while implementing CAN FD for Pcan I think we should have a timing parameter class. This class will have multiple constructors from the different parameter options...
Please correct me if I am wrong, generally it is possible to convert between different specification formats. Each interface should internally use the properties it needs from the timing parameters...
@christiansandberg, I've been following your work on #615 and it looks very promising. See my note about unifying arbitration and data timings. As a general note I think my parameter...
The note I mentioned is on the PCAN code in the PR. You can see it above in this page.
I must have missed it somehow.
@felixdivo @christiansandberg I still think we should consider adding a FDBitTiming class which will include both configurations. This would also allow us to remove the FD parameter as we could...
Had a look at this again. I see 2 options: 1) Extend the bit timing class with optional timings for CAN FD. This will allow using a single class which...
@felixdivo @christiansandberg I think the third option should be ok. This would mean changing most of this PR. I don't currently have time / convenient access to hardware on a...
@bihanssen any news on this issue? I am working on incorporating thread dfu into a project and this could be very useful.
The closest thing I can think of is the export to photo function of Fritzing